UNDERSTANDING KAMPUNG MADRAS OF INDONESIA LIMITED PROMINENCE VERSUS MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE LITTLE INDIAS

Havilah Labora  Lebin; S. W. Ginting

doi:10.54783/japp.v9i2.1593

Havilah Labora Lebin Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
S. W. Ginting Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/japp.v9i2.1593

Keywords: Cultural Identity, Cultural Enclaves, Urban Heritage, Urban Policy, Urbanism and City Planning.

Abstract

As debates on multicultural heritage intensify across Southeast Asia, this study investigates the architectural and cultural conditions that shape the identity of Kampung Madras in Medan in comparison with Little India districts in Penang, Kuala Lumpur, and Singapore. While these three enclaves have undergone coordinated conservation efforts, curated streetscape enhancement, and cultural programming that reinforce their Indian heritage, Kampung Madras presents a contrasting trajectory. Its temples, shophouses, and commercial corridors reflect traces of Indian architectural tradition, yet appear fragmented due to unregulated growth, weak façade continuity, and limited municipal intervention. Intangible cultural life in Kampung Madras remains vibrant through rituals, festivals, and intergenerational practices, but these expressions operate with minimal public visibility and rely almost entirely on community initiative. In the comparative cases, similar traditions are supported, staged, and woven into city branding, enabling a stronger symbolic presence. Through qualitative analysis supported by visual documentation, this study shows that the reduced prominence of Kampung Madras is rooted in policy gaps, uneven heritage governance, and the absence of culturally sensitive planning mechanisms that have long guided the development of Penang, Kuala Lumpur, and Singapore’s Little Indias. The study argues that recognizing enclaves like Kampung Madras as integral components of urban multicultural identity is essential for sustaining their architectural and cultural vitality. It suggests that heritage-sensitive zoning, inclusive conservation strategies, and participatory planning are necessary to strengthen Medan’s commitment to cultural diversity and enhance the resilience of its Indian enclave.

References

Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. Routledge.

Bhattacharya, J. (2019). Stories from the margins: Indian business communities in the growth of colonial Singapore. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 50(4), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463420000041

Blackburn, K., & Tan, P. H. A. (2015). The emergence of heritage conservation in Singapore and the Preservation of Monuments Board (1958–76). Southeast Asian Studies, 4(2), 341–364.

Bunnell, T., Barter, P. A., & Morshidi, S. (2002). Kuala Lumpur metropolitan area: A globalizing city-region. Cities, 19(5), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00036-7

George Town World Heritage Incorporated (GTWHI). (2021). George Town World Heritage Site management plan. George Town World Heritage Incorporated (GTWHI)

Hall, S. (2019). Cultural identity and diaspora. Duke University Press.

Jiao, Y., & Singh, M. K. M. (2024). Linguistic landscape in George Town, Malaysia: Language visibility in a postcolonial and globalized context. Ampersand, 13, 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100202

Kong, L. (1997). Cultural icons and urban development: The case of the Singapore National Day Parade. Political Geography, 16(3), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(95)00135-2

Kong, L. (2007). Cultural icons and urban development in Asia: Economic imperative, national identity, and global city status. Political Geography, 26(4), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.007

Kong, L., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (1996). The construction of national identity through the production of ritual and spectacle: An analysis of National Day Parades in Singapore. Political Geography, 15(5), 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(96)00009-9

Kurniawan, A. (n.d.). Sejarah perkembangan Kampung Madras di Medan.

https://doi.org/10.33005/BORDER.V2I2.68

Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press.

Logan, W. (2012). Cultural diversity, cultural heritage and human rights: Towards heritage management as human rights-based cultural practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.637573

Logan, W. (2020). Cultural diversity, heritage and human rights: Intersections in theory and practice. Routledge.

Low, S. M. (2000). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture. University of Texas Press.

Lubis, L., Wardiyanto, B., & Setijaningrum, E. (2024). Conservation of cultural heritage in Indonesia: A review of policy and practice. Journal of Governance, 9(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v9i4.24554

Nas, P. J. M. (2009). Cities full of symbols: A theory of urban space and culture. Leiden University Press.

National Heritage Board. (2023). Singapore’s intangible cultural heritage inventory. Government of Singapore.

Noraffendi, B. Q. B. M., & Rahman, N. H. A. (2020). Urban spatial practices and informal street dynamics in developing cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 447(1), 012072.https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012072

Ong, H. Y., & Marzuki, A. (2025). The impact of tangible heritage towards historic building usages in the George Town UNESCO World Heritage Site in Penang, Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 23(38). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i38.1848

Rath, J. (2007). Tourism, ethnic diversity and the city. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413869

Razali, H. R. J., Tobi, S. U. M., Bilyamin, S. F. I., & Wahab, M. H. (2017).

The influence of walkability towards urban street design in Kuala Lumpur. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321915756

Reid, A. (2010). Imperial alchemy: Nationalism and political identity in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.

Tan, S. B. (2015). Conservation and revitalization of a historical inner city: The case of George Town World Heritage Site. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.217

Thirunavukkarasu, P., & Mat Radzuan, I. S. (2021). Significance of conserving built heritage on commercial property: A case study of Little India, Kuala Lumpur. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 2(2), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.30880/rmtb.2021.02.02.062

Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). (2023). Conservation guidelines for Little India. Government of Singapore.

Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Routledge.

Wiryomartono, B. (2020). Traditions and transformations of habitation in Indonesia: Power, architecture, and urbanism. Springer Nature Singapore.

Zainudin, H., Bachek, S. H., & Haron, N. A. (2014). Preservation of Culture and Built Heritage in New Urban Development: A Case Study on Little India Brickfields, Kuala Lumpur. Conference paper.