MANAJEMEN KINERJA APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA DI INDONESIA: SEBUAH KONSEP MANAJEMEN PUBLIK BARU
Abstract
New public management is a new concept in public administration science. This concept is results oriented, transparency and accountability of administrative services. Performance management is the key to results orientation. The Performance Management System is a record of the inputs, processes, outputs and results of government procedures. This helps to achieve the government's progress towards the goals. The Research goals to introduce the concept of performance management of the state civil servants in Indonesia as a new public management concept. The research used qualitative methods in the analysis of the research object. The results show that the bureaucracy that is complicated and still lacks quality of public services has become the curse of public administration science in Indonesia. The ASN performance management concept as a new performance-based public management is a breakthrough that can improve ASN performance which in the end has an impact on the performance of public services.
References
Alimudin, A. (2017). Peran Sistem Manajemen Kinerja, Kompetensi Pegawai dan Promosi Jabatan dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi, 13(3), 155-165.
Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2005). Managing Performance: Performance Management in Action. CIPD publishing.
Bititci, U. S., Mendibil, K., Nudurupati, S., Garengo, P., & Turner, T. (2006). Dynamics of Performance Measurement and Organisational culture. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A. L., & Grandy, G. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods. London: Sage.
Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From Old Public Administration To New Public Management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), 9-16.
Fathya, V. N. (2019). Reformasi Manajemen SDM Aparatur di Indonesia. GOVERNMENT: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(1), 49-56.
Ferlie, E., & Steane, P. (2002). Changing Developments in NPM. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1459-1469.
Kadarisman, M. (2018). Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara. Depok: Rajawali Press
Kristiana, T. (2015). Penerapan Profile Matching untuk Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Negeri sipil (PNS). Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 11(2), 161-170.
Marr, B., & Schiuma, G. (2003). Business Performance Measurement‐Past, Present and Future. Management decision, 41(8), 680-687.
Moleong, L. J. (2005). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nunberg, B. (1994). Experience with Civil Service Pay and Employment Reform: An Overview. Rehabilitating government: Pay and employment reform in Africa, 119-159.
Osborne, D. G., & Gaebler, T. T. (1992) Reinventing Government. Read-ing, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 tahun 2011 tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja ASN
Priansa, D. J. (2017). Manajemen Kinerja Kepegawaian dalam Pengelolaan SDM Perusahaan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia
Ruky, A. S. (2002). Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Schedler, K., & Proeller, I. (2000). New public management. Stuttgart/Wien.
Soltani, E., Van Der Meer, R., & Williams, T. M. (2005). A Contrast of HRM and TQM Approaches to Performance Management: Some Evidence. British Journal of Management, 16(3), 211-230.
Sugiyono, P. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.
Wang, X., & Berman, E. (2001). Hypotheses about Performance Measurement in Counties: Findings from A Survey. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 403-428.
.png){kind=logo}
.png)
1.png)
