MASA DEPAN PENGEMBANGAN USAHA KECIL DAN MENENGAH (UKM): PERSPEKTIF JARINGAN PERUSAHAAN DAN KEBIJAKAN

  • Mumuh Muksin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Keywords: Policy, Government, Small and Medium Enterproses, Networks

Abstract

We review policies that support SMEs in various fields. Our review shows that opinions suggesting that subsidizing SME activities (different from some company activities regardless of size) is not economically justified. Nonetheless, it is widely recognized that SMEs suffer relative losses to large companies, especially in the area of ​​access to information and technology. We then study the possibilities offered by the network in helping SMEs deal with the losses they experience. Our research shows that there are benefits to companies from participating in networks. Furthermore, because networks can help companies overcome some of their innate losses, they can become independent of public assistance and be better able to compete with larger companies once initial impetus is given for the establishment of cooperative networks that can enable companies to compete more effectively.

References

American Bar Association (2002), “The Economics of Innovation: A Survey”, Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Association, July.

Andersson, Thomas (2000), “Policy Design, Implementation and Evaluation–Rationale, Efficiency and Systemic Concerns”, delivered to the SME Forum on “Public Policies for SMEs in Europe”, Lisbon, 13-14 April.

Audretsch, D.B., W.J. Baumol and A.E. Burke (2001), “Competition Policy in Dynamic Markets”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 613-634.

Basri, E. (2000), “Inter-Firm Technological Collaboration in Australia in an International Context: Implications for Innovation Performance and Public Policy”, Working Paper 2000-01, AEGIS, University of Western Sydney.

Belli, Pedro (1997), “The Comparative Advantage of Government: A Review”, Working Paper No. 1834, The World Bank.

Berry, Albert (1997), “SME Competitiveness: The Power of Networking and Subcontracting”, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, January.

Bickerdyke, Ian and Ralph Lattimore (1997), “Reducing the Regulatory Burden: Does Firm Size Matter?” Industry Commission Staff Research Paper, Canberra, December.

Clarke, Julian L. and Simon Evenett (2003), “A Multilateral Framework for Competition Policy?” Chapter II in State Secretariat of Economic Affairs Switzerland and Simon J. Evenett (eds.), The Singapore Issues and the World Trading System: The Road to Cancun and Beyond, World Trade Institute.

Cohen, Wesley M. and Daniel A. Levinthal (1989), “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, September, 569-596.

DeBresson, C. and F. Amesse (1991), “Networks of Innovators: A Review and Introduction to this Issue”, Research Policy, Vol. 20, 363-379.

De Koning, A.C.P., J.A.H. Snijders, and J.G. Vianen (1992), “SME Policy in the European Community”, paper presented at Gateways to Growth-Opportunities for Smaller Firms in the EC, cited in Storey (1994).

Freeman, C. (1991), “Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues”, Research Policy, Vol. 20, 499-514.

Fritsch, Michael (2001), “Innovation by Networking: An Economic Perspective”, in K. Koschatsky, M. Kulicke and A. Zenker (eds.), Innovation Networks: Concepts and Challenges in the European Perspective, Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, 25-33.

Gans, J. S., and John Quiggin (2003), “A Technological and Organisational Explanation for the Size Distribution of Firms”, Small Business Economics, 21, 243-256.

Geroski, P. A. (1990), “Innovation, Technological Opportunity and Market Structure”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 52, 586-602.

Hall, Chris (2002), Profile of SMEs and SME Issues in APEC 1990-2000, APEC Small and Medium Enterprises Working Group, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Hallberg, Kristin (2000), “A Market-Oriented Strategy for Small and Medium-Scale Enterprises”, Discussion Paper No. 40, International Finance Corporation, The World Bank.

Harvie, Charles (2003), “Regional SMEs and Competition in the Wake of the Financial and Economic Crisis”, in Tran Van Hoa and Charles Harvie (eds.), New Asian Regionalism: Responses to Globalization and Crises, Palgrave Macmillan, 96-124.

Hawtrey, K.M. (1997), “Finance for Australian SMEs: Policy Issues”, Economic Papers, Vol. 16 No. 2, June, 39-50.

Humphrey, John (1995), “Industrial Reorganization in Developing Countries: From Models to Trajectories”, World Development, 23(1), 149-162.

Humphrey, John and Hubert Schmitz (1995), “Principles for Promoting Clusters and Networks of SMEs”, paper commissioned by the Small and Medium Industries Branch, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, October.

Humphrey, John and Hubert Schmitz (1996), “The Triple C Approach to Local Industrial Policy”, World Development, 24(12), 1859-1877.

Industry Canada (1995), “Competition Policy as a Dimension of Economic Policy: A Comparative Perspective”, Occasional Paper No. 7, May.

Lattimore, R., A. Madge, B. Martin and J. Mills (1998), “Design Principles for Small Business Programs and Regulations”, Staff Research Paper, Productivity Commission, Australia, August.

Levitsky, J. (1996), “Support Systems for SMEs in Developing Countries: A Review”, Paper commissioned by the Small and Medium Industries Branch, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, March.

Liedholm, Carl and Donald C. Mead (1999), Small Enterprises and Economic Development, London and New York: Routledge.

Lundvall, B. A. (1988), “Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation”, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg & L. Soete (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, 349-369.

Mani, S. (2002), Government, Innovation and Technology Policy: An International Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Nooteboom, Bart (1999), “Innovation and Inter-firm Linkages: New Implications for Policy”, Research Policy, 28, 793-805.

OECD (2000), “Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Local Strength, Global Reach”, OECD Observer, June, 1-7.

Parker, Rachel (2000), “Small is Not Necessarily Beautiful: An Evaluation of Policies in Support of SMEs”, Australian Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 239-253.

Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) (2003), “Financing Small and Medium Enterprises: Challenges and Options”, Summary Report of the discussion at the Second Annual Conference of the PECC Finance Forum, Hua Tin, Thailand, July.

Rabellotti, Roberta (1995), “Is There an ‘Industrial District Model’? Footwear Districts in Italy and Mexico Compared”, World Development, 23(1), 29-41.

Revesz, John and Ralph Lattimore (1997), “Small Business Employment”, Industry Commission Staff Research Paper, Industry Commission, Canberra, August.

Rothwell, R. (1991), “External Networking and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Firms in Europe”, Technovation, 11(2), 93-112.

Scherer, Frederic M. (1970), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally.

Schmitz, Hubert and Khalid Nadvi (1999), “Clustering and Industrialization: Introduction”, World Development, 27(9), 1503-1514.

Shrieves, R.E. (1978), “Market Structure and Innovation: A New Perspective”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 26, 329-347.

Storey, D. J. (1982), Entrepreneurship and the New Firm, London and Canberra: Croom Helm.

Storey, D. J. (1994), Understanding the Small Business Sector, London: Routledge.

Symeonidis, George (2000), “Price Competition and Market Structure: The Impact of Cartel Policy on Concentration in the UK”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 1-26.

Van Cayseele, Patrick and Roger Van den Bergh (2000), “Antitrust Law”, in Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume III The Regulation of Contracts, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 467-497.

Vernon, R. (1979), “The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), 255-267.

Published
2020-06-14
How to Cite
Muksin, M. (2020). MASA DEPAN PENGEMBANGAN USAHA KECIL DAN MENENGAH (UKM): PERSPEKTIF JARINGAN PERUSAHAAN DAN KEBIJAKAN. PAPATUNG: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 3(1), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.54783/japp.v3i1.56