MODEL PENGINTEGRASIAN SPENDING REVIEW DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN ANGGARAN PADA KEMENTERIAN KESEHATAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA
Abstract
Budget decision making at the Ministry of Health has not taken advantage of the results of the spending review conducted by the Ministry of Finance. This condition is indicated by there are still seven indicators of RPJMN Health that have not been achieved and still require hard work even though the realization of health spending continues to increase. Therefore, the focus of this study aims to explore a model of integrating spending review in budget decision making at the Ministry of Health. This study uses a qualitative approach with an exploratory method, where the researcher seeks to explore and build the phenomena under study in an effort to answer the problems formulated previously. The results of the study indicate that there are factors that hinder and support the integration of spending reviews in budget decision making at the Ministry of Health so that an appropriate strategy is needed in integrating the spending review.
References
Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A. L., & Grandy, G. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods. London: Sage.
Catalano, G., & Erbacci, A. (2018). A Theoretical Framework for Spending Review Policies at a Time of Widespread Recession. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 17(2), 9-24.
Hawkesworth, I., & Klepsvik, K. (2013). Budgeting Levers, Strategic Agility and the Use of Performance Budgeting in 2011/12. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(1), 105-140.
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55-65.
Melkers, J. E., & Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Budgeters’ views of state performance‐budgeting systems: Distinctions across branches. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 54-64.
OECD. (2011). Typology and Implementation of Spending Reviews. OECD SBO Meeting on Performance and Results, November, 2011.
Parhusip, B. (2016). Analisis Implementasi Spending Review pada Kementerian Negara/Lembaga Tahun 2013-2015. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 20(3), 191-211.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis—into the Age of Austerity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Postuła, M. (2017). Spending Reviews–a Tool to Support the Efficient Management of Public Funds. Journal of Management and Business Administration, 25(2), 63-90.
Prabowo, C. E. (2018). Spending Review 2018: Meningkatkan Value for Money Belanja Pemerintah. Indonesian Treasury Update, 3(2), 30-42.
Robinson, S. E. (2003). Bureaucrats and public schools: Does bureaucratization promote incrementalism in program budgeting for Texas school? The University of Texas at Dallas Political Economy Working Paper, Richardson, Texas.
Robinson, M. (2013). Spending Review. Working Party of Senior Budget Officials. 3’th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials, OECD Conference Centre, Paris, 3-4 June, 1-9.
Rutgers, M. R., & Van Der Meer, H. (2010). The Origins and Restriction of Efficiency in Public Administration: Regaining Efficiency as the Core Value of Public Administration. Administration & Society, 42(7), 755-779.
Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economic Review, 49(3), 253-283.
Thurmaier, K. (1992). Budgetary decisionmaking in central budget bureaus: An experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(4), 463-487.
Thurmaier, K. (1995a). Execution Phase Budgeting in Local Governments: It's not just for control anymore! State & Local Government Review, 27(2), 102-117.
Thurmaier, K. M., & Willoughby, K. G. (2001). Policy and Politics in State Budgeting. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector. New York: Routledge.
World Bank (2013) Beyond the Annual Budget: Global Experience with Medium-Term Expenditure Frameworks. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods: Applied Social Research Methods Series (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks.
Awaluddin, D. T., & Hasanudin, H. (2020). TINJAUAN ANALISIS KINERJA LAPORAN KEUANGAN PADA PERUSAHAAN FOOD & BEVERAGE YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI PADA TAHUN 2013-2017. JURNAL REKAYASA INFORMASI, 9(1), 26-43.
Nurwulandari, A., Adnyana, I. M., & Hasanudin, H. (2019). Did Inter-Regional Trade Agreements Bring Mutual Benefits? An Empirical Scheme of Indonesian Commodity Exports in Asean-China Free Trade Area. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(6).
Kartika, R., & Hasanudin, H. (2019). ANALISIS PENGARUH LIKUIDITAS, LEVERAGE, AKTIVITAS, DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP FINANCIAL DISTRESS PADA PERUSAHAAN TERBUKA SEKTOR INFRASTRUKTUR, UTILITAS, DAN TRANSPORTASI PERIODE 2011-2015. Oikonomia: Jurnal Manajemen, 15(1).
Wahyudi, S., & Pangestuti, I. R. D. Managing The Pension Fund To Improve Portfolio Performance: An Empirical Study On Employer Pension Funds In Indonesia.
.png){kind=logo}
.png)
1.png)
