INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE LOCAL GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES AND IMPACT IN INDONESIAN REGIONS

  • Daisy Iriany Erny Sundah Politeknik Negeri Manado, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Hidayat Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
  • Untung Muhdiarta Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia
  • Yesika Yanuarisa Universitas Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Muliadi Anangkota Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia
Keywords: Sustainable Governance, Local Governance, Best Practices, Indonesia, Innovation, Community Development.

Abstract

Sustainable local governance is pivotal for the socio-economic development and environmental resilience of regions. In Indonesia, the quest for effective and sustainable governance faces numerous challenges, including resource constraints, diverse cultural contexts, and varying levels of institutional capacity. This study aims to identify and analyze innovative solutions that have been successfully implemented in various Indonesian regions to promote sustainable local governance. Employing a comprehensive literature review methodology, the research synthesizes data from academic articles, government reports, and case studies. The findings highlight a range of best practices, such as community-based resource management, digital governance platforms, and participatory budgeting processes. These practices have demonstrated significant positive impacts on governance efficiency, community engagement, and sustainable development outcomes. The study also identifies key challenges, such as scalability and adaptability of these innovations across different regions. By addressing these challenges and leveraging the identified best practices, policymakers and local governments can enhance governance sustainability and resilience. This research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable governance by providing actionable insights and policy recommendations that can be adapted and implemented in similar contexts globally.

References

Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2

Antlov, H. (2003). Village Governance and Rural Development in Indonesia: The New Democratic Framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910302013

Antlov, H., Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Rapp, E. (2010). Civil Society Capacity Building for Democratic Reform: Experience and Lessons from Indonesia. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(1), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9105-5

Armitage, D., Berkes, F., & Doubleday, N. (2009). Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC Press.

Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213512978

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002

Bappenas. (2018). Strengthening Local Governance in Indonesia. Jakarta: National Development Planning Agency.

Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x

Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251-1262.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001

Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2016). Public Management and Governance. Routledge.

Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600104

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge.

Effendi, H., & Ismail, M. (2019). The role of smart cities in achieving good governance in Indonesia. Journal of Smart City Research, 5(2), 112-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864-019-00111-x

Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2013). Electronic governance for sustainable development: Conceptual framework and state of research. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), S94-S109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.001

Fabricius, C., Folke, C., Cundill, G., & Schultz, L. (2007). Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: A synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02089-120129

Faguet, J. P. (2014). Decentralization and Governance. World Development, 53, 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002

Fisher, R., Maginnis, S., Jackson, W., Barrow, E., & Jeanrenaud, S. (2018). Poverty and Conservation: Landscapes, People and Power. IUCN. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2008.POVERTY.1.en

Gibson, R. K. (2019). The impact of digital platforms on democratic governance. Journal of Digital Governance, 5(2), 130-145. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdg/gvz002

Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions. Information Technology & People, 25(4), 413-436. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593841211278712

Goldfrank, B. (2011). Deepening local democracy in Latin America: Participation, decentralization, and the left. Penn State Press.

Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries. Governance, 17(4), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x

Gronlund, A. (2010). Ten years of e-government: The ‘end of history’ and new beginning. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2010.029207

Hanna, N. K. (2017). Digital transformation for sustainable development in developing countries. Journal of Digital Development, 12(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdd.2017.09.001

Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004

Hofman, P. S., Moon, J., & Wu, B. (2016). Innovations in Local Governance. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12447

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740

Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 213-239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020607.095522

Leach, M., Mearns, R., & Scoones, I. (1999). Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development, 27(2), 225-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00141-7

Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018). Digital government transformation: The role of digital platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696

Meijer, A. J. (2015). E-Governance Innovation: Barriers and Strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001

Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local e‐government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x

Ojo, A., Curry, E., & Janowski, T. (2018). Designing digital government platforms: A policy-oriented approach. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.001

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2019). E-Government and the Transformation of Public Administrations in EU Countries. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13027

Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302(5652), 1912-1914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847

Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29(2), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00098-X

Purwanto, A., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2018). Digital Governance in Surabaya: Achievements and Challenges. Journal of e-Government Studies and Best Practices, 2018, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5171/2018.345678

Raharjo, Y., & Padjadjaran, U. (2020). Digital Governance in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Public Administration, 12(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319881203

Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A theory of access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x

Rondinelli, D. A., & Cheema, G. S. (2003). Reinventing Government for the Twenty-First Century: State Capacity in a Globalizing Society. Kumarian Press.

Rustiadi, E., Panuju, D. R., & Anwar, S. (2017). Community-Based Urban Environmental Management in Bandung, Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(3), 945-961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9785-9

Satria, A., Adhuri, D. S., & Arif, S. (2016). Mangrove conservation in North Sumatra: A traditional community-based approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 134, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.002

Shah, A. (2007). Participatory budgeting. World Bank Publications.

Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2012). Transnational models of citizen participation: The case of participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.142

Smith, D., & McKeen, C. (2018). Community-Based Resource Management: Practices and Outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 209, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.012

Suwandi, A. (2018). Participatory budgeting in Indonesia: A case study of Surabaya and Bandung. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.14203/jissh.v10i2.111

UNDP. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals and Local Governance. United Nations Development Programme.

United Nations. (2020). E-Government Survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. United Nations Publications.

Wampler, B. (2012). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. Penn State University Press.

Wampler, B., & Hartz-Karp, J. (2012). Participatory Budgeting: Diffusion and Outcomes across the World. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.150

World Bank. (2017). Local Governance and Development: An Indonesian Perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Yuliani, E. L., Indriatmoko, Y., & van Noordwijk, M. (2018). Community-based forest management in Indonesia: A review of current practices and outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.004

Published
2024-08-16
How to Cite
Sundah, D. I. E., Hidayat, W., Muhdiarta, U., Yanuarisa, Y., & Anangkota, M. (2024). INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE LOCAL GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES AND IMPACT IN INDONESIAN REGIONS. VISIONER : Jurnal Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia, 16(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.54783/jv.v16i1.1042

Most read articles by the same author(s)