ENHANCING ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE THROUGH INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS: A CASE STUDY OF SURABAYA CITY, INDONESIA

Muhammad Nurdin Hidayat

doi:10.54783/jv.v16i3.1261

Muhammad Nurdin Hidayat STIT Muhammad Mardiyana, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/jv.v16i3.1261

Keywords: Local Governance, Accountability, Transparency, Integrated Information Systems, Surabaya City.

Abstract

This study explores how integrated information systems enhance accountability and transparency in local governance, focusing on the case of Surabaya City, Indonesia. As public demands for open and efficient administration increase, local governments are under pressure to adopt digital tools that support transparent decision-making and accessible public services. This research adopts a literature review method, systematically analyzing scholarly sources published in the last decade related to digital governance, e-government, and information system integration. Findings indicate that the implementation of integrated information systems contributes significantly to reducing bureaucratic opacity and improving public trust. Surabaya City has emerged as a national model due to its progressive use of digital platforms to promote real-time data sharing and citizen engagement. Key enabling factors include strong political leadership, cross-sectoral collaboration, and investment in digital infrastructure. However, challenges remain in ensuring data interoperability, cybersecurity, and capacity building among public servants. The study highlights critical insights from both domestic and international experiences, offering a comparative lens for analysis. By synthesizing existing literature, this research provides a conceptual foundation for policymakers seeking to enhance local governance through technology. The findings underscore the need for a comprehensive and adaptive strategy to sustain digital transformation in the public sector.

References

Afiyah, S. (2023). The Impact of E-Government Services, Citizen Participation, and Transparency on Public Trust in Government. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(6).

Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161–173.

Barrios, N. A., & Moreno, F. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of e-Government initiatives in addressing local governance challenges: A case study of Zamboanga City, Philippines. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.

Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.

Fathirah, F., Nirwana, N., & Haliah, H. (2024). Budget transparency and accountability in local government. Asian Journal of Management and Accounting, 5(2), 1172–1185.

Fox, J. A. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 663–671.

Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633-646.

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2023). Digital transparency and citizen participation: Evidence from the United States. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101-112.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586.

Heeks, R. (2021). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D).

Hirsch, B. (2019). Why state and local government should prioritize IT standards. StateScoop.

Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 371–376.

Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1–S8.

Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1-5.

Kessy, A. T. (2020). Transparency in local government finance and service delivery: The case of Mwanza City and Moshi District Councils in Tanzania. Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(2), 194–204.

Khene, C., Siebörger, I., Thinyane, M., & Simuja, C. (2021). Power Participation in Digital Citizen Engagement in South African Local Government: The Case of MOBISAM. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09798

Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427–436.

Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 507–524). Oxford University Press.

Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408.

Misuraca, G., & Viscusi, G. (2020). Is open data enough? E-Governance challenges for open government. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 7(2), 1-14.

Nam, T. (2018). Examining the anti-corruption effect of e-government and the moderating effect of national culture: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 273-282.

Pappas, I. O., Patelis, T. E., & Giannakos, M. N. (2020). Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: Conceptualizing adverse digital experiences. Information Systems Journal, 30(1), 1-14.

Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (2019). E-Government interoperability: A research framework. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 1-10.

Pontoh, R., Rura, Y., Rahman, A., & Ibrahim, M. (2023). The transparency level of local governments in Indonesia: Does the level of financial health matter? Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 9(1), 123–150.

Riduan, A., Rachmanto, T., Brumadyadisty, G., & Sufa, S. A. (2024). Case Study on Public Service Responsibility Implementation in Surabaya via the Broadband Learning Centre Programme. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(2), 2789–2805.

Setiawan, E. P., & Nasution, A. (2020). LAPOR! as a public service complaint system in Indonesia: A case study. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 5(2), 123–134.

Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., & Fahlevi, H. (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1735690.

Springbrook Software. (2023). Top challenges for IT directors. https://springbrooksoftware.com/2024s-top-8-challenges-for-local-government-it-directors/

Suhardono, R., & Nugroho, Y. (2019). Digital literacy and the role of government in Indonesia's open government initiative. Information Polity, 24(3), 317–328.

Transparency International. (2024). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024: Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024/index/idn

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). Handbook on Digital Transformation in Local Government: Leadership, Human Resources and Organizational Structure. https://publicadministration.desa.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2023/Handbook%20on%20Digital%20Transformation%20in%20Local%20Government%20Leadership%2C%20Human%20Resources%20and%20Organizational%20Structure_Final.pdf

World Bank. (2015). Indonesia: Initiatives to Improve Transparency, Accountability and Public Participation at Local Government. Retrieved from https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/956551467994692736/indonesia-initiatives-to-improve-transparency-accountability-and-public-participation-at-local-government

World Bank. (2016). Digital dividends: World development report 2016. World Bank Publications.

Yustiari, S. H. (2019). E-Government Innovation: E-Wadul Application for Better Public Service of Surabaya City. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of Business and Public Administration (AICoBPA 2018) (pp. 209–211). Atlantis Press.