DINAMIKA SISTEM KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INDONESIA DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN DI KELAS
Abstract
To be able to develop their potential, humans need education through the learning process. Language is a very important part of education, because of its function as a means of communication and introduction in the world of education. Therefore, policies in language education must be formulated in a comprehensive and visionary manner so that their implementation can be optimized and contribute to realizing the goals of national education. On the other hand, education policies must also accommodate the proportional use of the Indonesian language. This research will be carried out using a qualitative approach and data sourced from various previous studies and studies. The results of this study found that language design as an effort to develop language in a more advanced direction includes three processes, namely design, implementation and evaluation. Indonesian has a position as the National Language and as the State Language.
References
Alamri, H. R. H. (2019). Investigation EFL Student Teachers‟ Learning Performance, Attitudes and Peer Interaction in Flipped Classroom. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 1-29.
Alexander, N. (2003). Language education policy, national and sub-national identities in South Africa. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 17-18.
Avni, S., Barni, M., Bekerman, Z., & Bialystok, E. (2014). widely on those issues. Challenges for Language Education and Policy: Making Space for People, 323.
Bonura, C. (2007). Political Science, the Anxiety of Interdisciplinary Engagement and Southeast Asian Studies. Knowing Southeast Asian Subjects, 205-43.
De Zeeuw, M., Grootjen, F., Kootstra, G. J., & Tellings, A. (2019). Lexical characteristics of written language input across primary grades: An analysis of a Dutch corpus based lexicon. Linguistics and education, 49, 11-21.
Ediyanto, E., Atika, I. N., Kawai, N., & Prabowo, E. (2017). Inclusive education in Indonesia from the perspective of Widyaiswara in Centre for Development and empowerment of teachers and education personnel of kindergartens and special Education. IJDS: Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 4(2), 104-116.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International journal of applied linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.
Fogg, K. W. (2015). The standardisation of the Indonesian language and its consequences for Islamic communities. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 46(1), 86-110.
Gynne, A., & Bagga-Gupta, S. (2013). Young people's languaging and social positioning. Chaining in “bilingual” educational settings in Sweden. Linguistics and education, 24(4), 479-496.
Halliday, M. A. (2005). On matter and meaning: the two realms of human experience. Linguistics & the Human Sciences, 1(1).
Hornberger, N. H. (2002). Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. Language policy, 1(1), 27-51.
Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language culture and curriculum, 15(2), 93-105.
Ismail, I. (2016). Character education based on religious values: an Islamic perspective. Ta'dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 21(1), 41-58.
Madeni, F., Horiuchi, S., & Iida, M. (2011). Evaluation of a reproductive health awareness program for adolescence in urban Tanzania-A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test research. Reproductive health, 8(1), 1-9.
Manan, S. A., David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (2016). Language management: A snapshot of governmentality within the private schools in Quetta, Pakistan. Language policy, 15(1), 3-26.
Meda, L., & Swart, A. J. (2018). Analysing learning outcomes in an Electrical Engineering curriculum using illustrative verbs derived from Bloom’s Taxonomy. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 399-412.
Minakova, L. Y. (2014). Critical thinking development in foreign language teaching for non-language-majoring students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154, 324-328.
Nugroho, A. Understanding the Position and Function of the Indonesian Language as the Basis of Nationalism Spirit. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Language Month UNIB2015, 2015, 285-291.
O'Shea, C., McKenna, S., & Thomson, C. (2019). ‘We throw away our books’: Students’ reading practices and identities. Linguistics and Education, 49, 1-10.
Pickett, K. E., & Pearl, M. (2001). Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55(2), 111-122.
Rajandran, K. Language planning for the Malay language in Malaysia since independence. Iranian Journal of Language Studies 2 (2) (2008) 237-248.
Razavipour, K. (2011). A. Mehdi Riazi, Macquarie University, Australia. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS) volume 5 (2), 123.
Silalahi, R., & Yuwono, U. (2018). The sustainability of Pancasila in Indonesian education system. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 3(2), 58-78.
Stephens, D., Morgan, D. N., DeFord, D. E., Donnelly, A., Hamel, E., Keith, K. J., ... & Leigh, S. R. (2011). The impact of literacy coaches on teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(3), 215-249.
.png){kind=logo}
.png)
1.png)
