PERAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK DALAM MENGENTASKAN KEMISKINAN DAN KESENJANGAN SOSIAL
Abstract
The research questions that will be investigated are how to establish a clear distinction between poverty and inequality in public policy debates and how public administrators can formulate and implement policies that will reduce world inequality today. Equality is not always seen as an equation of economic conditions but mainly as an equal opportunity to achieve it. This is why it is important to refer to the concept of social justice when addressing inequality. This article will review and analyze the current literature on poverty, inequality and social justice and will suggest some new approaches to eliminating inequality. Although the initiative required to achieve these objectives must come from politics, the public administrator will ultimately be the one to provide a definite plan or procedure to ensure the fulfillment of these political initiatives. This article will discuss how public policymakers can promote equality and social justice.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Data dan Informasi Kemiskinan 2016 dan 2017. Jakarta: BPS Jakarta.
Bassett, K. (1993). Urban cultural strategies and urban regeneration: a case study and critique. Environment and Planning A, 25(12), 1773-1788.
Easterly, W, 2001. The Middle Class Consensus and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth 6, 317-35.
Ehrenpreis, D. (2006). What is poverty? Concepts and measures (No. 9). International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
Frederickson, H. G. (1990). Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228-37.
Gilder, G. (2013). Knowledge and power: The information theory of capitalism and how it is revolutionizing our world. Regnery Publishing.
Hargrove, D. S., Curtin, L., & Kirschner, B. (2017). Ruralism and regionalism: Myths and misgivings regarding the homogeneity of rural populations. In Handbook of rural school mental health (pp. 249-259). Springer, Cham.
Hidayat, A. (2017). Kesenjangan Sosial Terhadap Pendidikan Sebagai Pengaruh Era Globalisasi. Justisi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1).
Jati, W. R. (2015). Less cash society: Menakar mode konsumerisme baru kelas menengah Indonesia. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 14(2), 102-112.
Kaplinsky, R. (2013). Globalization, poverty and inequality: Between a rock and a hard place. John Wiley & Sons.
Lindert, P. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2003). Does globalization make the world more unequal?. In Globalization in historical perspective (pp. 227-276). University of Chicago Press.
Lok-Dessallien, R. (1999). Review of poverty concepts and indicators. UNDP Soc Dev Poverty Elimin Div Poverty Reduct Ser from http://www. undp. orgpovertypublicationspovReview pdf, 21.
Nijaki, L. K. (2015). Justifying and juxtaposing environmental justice and sustainaility: towards an inter-generational and intra-generational analysis of environmental equity in public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 85-116.
Suharto, E. (2004). Kemiskinan dan keberfungsian sosial: studi kasus rumah tangga miskin di Indonesia. Bandung: STKSPress.
Suharto, E. (2005). Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat. Bandung: Rafika Aditama.
Suyanto, B. (2005). Kemiskinan dan Kesenjangan Sosial: Ketika Pembangunan Tak Berpihak Kepada Rakyat Miskin. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Svara, J. H., & Brunet, J. R. (2005). Social equity is a pillar of public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(3), 253-258.
Thurow, L. C. (1987). A surge in inequality. Scientific American, 256(5), 30-37.
Unterhalter, E., & North, A. (2017). Education, poverty and global goals for gender equality: How people make policy happen. Routledge.
Yigitcanlar, T. (2010). Knowledge-based development of cities: a myth or reality?. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 1(3), 153-157.
.png){kind=logo}
.png)
1.png)
