LEGAL POLITICS AND POWER DOMINANCE IN THE FORMATION OF NATIONAL STRATEGIC REGULATIONS: THE CRISIS OF CHECKS AND BALANCES IN INDONESIAN DEMOCRACY

  • Iskandar Syukur Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
Keywords: Legal Politics, Power Dominance, National Strategic Regulation, Checks and Balances, Indonesian Democracy.

Abstract

 

The formation of national strategic regulations in Indonesia demonstrates increasing attention to the relationship between legal politics and the use of power in the process of state governance. Regulations that play a crucial role in supporting the national agenda are often influenced not only by development needs and government interests but also by the power relations that develop in the decision-making process. This situation raises concerns about the implementation of checks and balances mechanisms, particularly when the policy-making process shows a tendency towards a concentration of influence among certain actors within the government system. This study aims to analyze the influence of legal politics and the dominance of power in the formation of national strategic regulations and their implications for the implementation of checks and balances in Indonesia's democratic system. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method through the utilization of various relevant sources, such as scientific articles, previous research results, books, and various documents related to the research focus. The results show that the direction of legal politics in the formation of national strategic regulations is closely related to various state interests and policy orientations that develop in governance. The dominance of power in the legislative process has been shown to influence the effectiveness of the oversight function between state institutions, the balance of authority, and institutional independence in the implementation of the control function over policy. This situation has implications for the quality of Indonesian democracy through its influence on public participation, public trust, representation, and accountability in state administration.

References

Aspinall, E., Fossati, D., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Elites, masses, and democratic decline in Indonesia. Democratization, 27(4), 505-526.

Avelino, F. (2021). Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation. Journal of Political Power, 14(3), 425-448.

Boolaky, P. K., Mirosea, N., & Singh, K. (2018). On the regulatory changes in government accounting development in Indonesia: A chronology from colonisation and post-colonisation era. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(3), 387-411.

Buyse, A. (2018). Squeezing civic space: Restrictions on civil society organizations and the linkages with human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(8), 966-988.

Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2018). Power and changing modes of governance in the euro crisis. Governance, 31(4), 609-624.

Carvalho, A., Pinto-Coelho, Z., & Seixas, E. (2019). Listening to the public–enacting power: citizen access, standing and influence in public participation discourses. Journal of environmental policy & planning, 21(5), 563-576.

Cheng, J. T. (2020). Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current opinion in psychology, 33, 238-244.

Dulio, V., van Bavel, B., Brorström-Lundén, E., Harmsen, J., Hollender, J., Schlabach, M., ... & Koschorreck, J. (2018). Emerging pollutants in the EU: 10 years of NORMAN in support of environmental policies and regulations. Environmental Sciences Europe, 30(1), 5.

Elbasani, A., & Šabić, S. Š. (2018). Rule of law, corruption and democratic accountability in the course of EU enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1317-1335.

Fanani, A., Yasin, I., & Murniati, A. (2020). Politics of education in curriculum development policy in Indonesia from 1947 to 2013: A documentary research. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 29-56.

García‐Quevedo, J., Jové‐Llopis, E., & Martínez‐Ros, E. (2020). Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms. Business strategy and the environment, 29(6), 2450-2464.

Grinin, L., Grinin, A., & Korotayev, A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic as a trigger for the acceleration of the cybernetic revolution, transition from e-government to e-state, and change in social relations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121348.

Holcombe, R. G. (2018). Checks and balances: enforcing constitutional constraints. Economies, 6(4), 57.

Hüssy, K., Limburg, K. E., De Pontual, H., Thomas, O. R., Cook, P. K., Heimbrand, Y., ... & Sturrock, A. M. (2021). Trace element patterns in otoliths: the role of biomineralization. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 29(4), 445-477.

Jansen, L. J., & Kalas, P. P. (2020). Improving governance of tenure in policy and practice: A conceptual basis to analyze multi-stakeholder partnerships for multi-stakeholder transformative governance illustrated with an example from South Africa. Sustainability, 12(23), 9901.

König, B., Janker, J., Reinhardt, T., Villarroel, M., & Junge, R. (2018). Analysis of aquaponics as an emerging technological innovation system. Journal of cleaner production, 180, 232-243.

Kusumastuti, A., & Khoiron, A. M. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo (LPSP).

Mazepus, H., & Toshkov, D. (2022). Standing up for democracy? Explaining citizens’ support for democratic checks and balances. Comparative Political Studies, 55(8), 1271-1297.

Meckling, J. (2018). The developmental state in global regulation: Economic change and climate policy. European Journal of International Relations, 24(1), 58-81.

Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2022). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: Comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review, 24(4), 489-511.

Ruggie, J. G. (2018). Multinationals as global institution: Power, authority and relative autonomy. Regulation & Governance, 12(3), 317-333.

Sari, R. (2023). Enhancing corporate governance through effective oversight and accountability. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 1(6), 344-356.

Topp, S. M., Schaaf, M., Sriram, V., Scott, K., Dalglish, S. L., Nelson, E. M., ... & Singh, S. (2021). Power analysis in health policy and systems research: a guide to research conceptualisation. BMJ Global Health, 6(11).

Von Bogdandy, A. (2020). Principles of a systemic deficiencies doctrine: How to protect checks and balances in the Member States. Common Market Law Review, 57(3).

Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2021). Four decades of public participation in risk decision making. Risk analysis, 41(3), 503-518.

Published
2024-08-30
How to Cite
Syukur, I. (2024). LEGAL POLITICS AND POWER DOMINANCE IN THE FORMATION OF NATIONAL STRATEGIC REGULATIONS: THE CRISIS OF CHECKS AND BALANCES IN INDONESIAN DEMOCRACY. PAPATUNG: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 7(2), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.54783/japp.v7i2.1686